¡Caution! : A suprisingly lengthy post is about to manifest. Readers have been warned!
Ignorance…
My personal opinion is that all ignorant people should be shot on site. However, I must remember that we are all ignorant. The only difference between each other is the matter of degree that we are. Let me put it this way. When I come up with an Ignorance Rating Chart, all people that score a 3 or below on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the least ignorant) will be removed from society, secured in some fashion (i.e. cruel, inhumane, humiliating) to a gigantic record player that is blasting Bob Dylan’s “Mr. Tambourine Man” in Dolby Digital Surround Sound. Yeah, that would be great. Heh
Now this small ramble has just made me realize that I, in the process of writing an entire paragraph, have failed to even hint at the meaning of my title. So now I will explain it (…before I forget again
).
Ignorance Killed The Cat, not Curiosity!
I’ve been doing some serious think-tank sessions with these sorts of idioms, because they are used so much. I have discovered that most wise tales are based on false judgements, along with embellishments and elaborations upon the truth of a story. With this in mind, I came to the deduction that most idioms are probably based upon superstition. Case-In-Point: “Break a mirror and have bad luck for 7 years”,”It’s bad luck if a black cat crosses your path.”, or “It’s bad luck to walk between the legs of a ladder.”. So this leads me to the idiom “Curiosity Killed The Cat”. I started thinking to myself about this idiom, reasoning with logic to find a motive behind the arrangement and selection of each word in the idiom.
…Curiosity
How on Earth could curiosity hurt anything? It’s an action before the action that leads up to effect. So I ask myself:
What would come after curiosity and before the effect (i.e. Curiosity killed the Cat), death being the effect in a four-strain reaction?
I found that answer to be ignorance. Think about it for a second. Let’s say a cat was killed, Autopsy Report reads : Death by Duel-Wheeled Ford F-250 Extend Cab @ 65mph (just to jerk those tears from those cat fanatics. Don’t get me wrong, I’m one too. However, I need something theatrical for my readers to relate to.).
Did the cat die because curiosity propelled it to cross the 6 lane interstate highway to see if there was a ball of yarn across the way, did it die because of its ignorance to acknowledge that there was a Duel-Wheeled Ford F-250 Extended Cab barreling down the highway at 65 mph?
I have just come to another realization. Perhaps it was not one or the other that held the sole responsibility for the death of the cat (Omitting the fact that it was the cat’s decision that had the responsibility for its death above all.) Perhaps it was both factors that played into the feline’s demise. There were two actions of ignorance and one action of curiosity.
Ignorance #1: The cat decides to cross the street. It gave in to its feelings, discarding obvious and logical alternatives in the process. Note that the feeling of curiosity will always override any thought of common sense and/ or self-consciousness to surroundings, due to the fact that it is natural for any living thing to have the desire to explore, discover, create, and question. This overriding action creates a disregard for the more sensible of choices within a singular decision. Therefore, the first action of ignorance was found in the neglection of choice for the provision of the more prominent of needs. Conclusively, the first action of ignorance was the creation of a hierarchy between the needs and the desires of living things, where the living organism makes its desires the king. In this hierarchy, it’s foundation has been embedded with the time-hardened gene sequences passed down from generation to generation within a species whose evolution is driven by Natural Selection. In end to “Ignorance #1″, it is ultimately the placement of desires over needs that sets up for the downfall of a species.
Curiosity #1: The cat is now walking across the road. There are no threats to survival. The first action of curiosity in this reation is merely an effect of the previous action of ignorance, due to the fact that the feeling of curiosity was the choice in the event of a decision that the instincts of the organism found principal amoung the rest of the choices offered.
Ignorance #2: At the time that the previous two actions were taken, there was no factor of motion. At this particular time, there is a Duel-Wheeled Ford F-250 Extended Cab travelling down the highway at 65 mph. At this point, desire becomes more of a distraction than a stimulation. The cat has the choice to acknowledge the threat and take necessary precautions for survival, or it has the choice to fail to yield to the threat, but instead remain focused upon the point in space that triggered its curiosity.
This is that forked-road that everyone talks about coming to sometime in your life. A literally split-second decision can alter the life of an organism entirely. History is altered by only that of choice. Nothing else can control the outcome in an action but a choice. A singular choice to or to not smoke cigarettes could determine your lifespan, your job, your income, your spouse, the clothes you wear, all the way down to your sexual activity. So in this session of thought, I have concluded that the power of choice is a force to wreckon with, perhaps nowhere physically, but historically and mentally, emotionally and psychologically, it is lifesaving, or potentially fatal. I have also concluded, and I will repeat my early statement:
“It is ultimately the placement of desires over needs that sets up for the impending downfall of a species.”
(Ignorance Killed The Cat, Not Curiosity: “The Fate of a Species Balances Upon a Singular Choice” © Wm. Caleb Cooley 2005)
…I just realized something profound…
That speculation in the first paragraph about a gigantic record player blasting Bob Dylan’s “Mr. Tambourine Man” in Dolby Digital Surround Sound would affect my readers so much more if I actually had Bob Dylan’s “Mr. Tambourine Man” playing in the background. How genius it would be. Too bad I can’t find a link to the song, and God forbid he actually have a music video to it. Yeck! I guess the reason why I chose that song in particular is because the writing in it is so subliminal. Few people actually realize that Bob Dylan wasn’t talking about a happy little guy shaking his tambourine. Instead, he was talking about a Crack Dealer. For all those who can’t add, here you go:
Mr. Tambourine Man = Crack Dealer
Play a song for me = Sell me some Crack
I’m not sleepy = I’m not high anymore
Now that we’ve analyzed the genius¹ of Bob Dylan, we can now move on to more pressing issues
¹(Little Known Fact of English Literature: In this particular usage of the word genius, instead of meaning intelligent, it would mean the splendiferous romance with the “Lady in the Sky with Diamonds”.).
Pressing Issues
Is it an omen that almost all of the original Little Rascals have been killed in terrible accidents?
How many licks does it take to get to the center of Planet Earth?
What ever happened to Nelly’s band-aid?
Can Jamie Foxx really sing, or does he just have a pretty voice?
Why on Earth is Xanga so addicting?
Sorry for writing so much. Honestly, if I had kept that in my head, it would have drove me insane…
…unless I already AM insane that is. Then, I don’t really have a reason why I wrote it all on Xanga.
<~ ¡Enjoy Incubus! ~>
(6uff)Muff
Hustler by Day
Original Highlandx 6locc G @ Nite
Eminent Threat to the “Free World”